A Skill Risk Assessment
What is your job actually exposed to?
Most AI exposure analysis is a snapshot taken six months ago. This one is current, methodology-transparent, and built around the question no vendor will ask: which parts of your job should stay human, regardless of what AI can do?
How this works
You give us your current job description, a role you're considering, or a description of what you actually do in a typical week. We map it to the U.S. Department of Labor's federal O*NET occupational taxonomy — 1,016 occupations and 19,000+ task statements.
Then we cross-reference each task against current AI capability, drawing on the Anthropic Economic Index and our own ongoing tracking of what AI tools can credibly do today versus what they're being marketed to do.
Finally we apply the Hartfull IQ judgment layer — five normative tests that ask not just can AI do this but should it. Two independent models run the analysis and a third pass reconciles them, because no single model has a complete read on the AI landscape.
Who built this
Amanda Bruun spent 16 years as a B2B SaaS operator, including a decade at Workday building marketing for the products that mapped the global skills ontology. She now runs Hartfull IQ, a consultancy focused on what AI shouldn't do as much as what it can. She writes The AI Ground Truth — a weekly essay on AI in the workplace — and you can read more about her work at hartfulliq.com.